Escape from Broad Match Hell!

27



Escape from Broad Match Hell!

by Dan Thies, StomperNet Faculty Member

 

cover

From Volume 1, Issue 5 of
The Net Effect

One of the most confusing, frustrating, and costly aspects of pay-per-click advertising is the variety of keyword match types offered by the big three search engines.

What Google Adwords calls "broad match" doesn't work exactly the same as MSN Adcenter's "broad match," and Yahoo doesn't have a broad match option at all.

As a result of this confusion, and because all three of the major players use their broadest possible matching system by default, many advertisers are losing money without even knowing about it.

Even if think you know what you're doing, it's still very easy to screw things up, especially with Adwords. That's because of the three major players, Google is the most aggressive about trying to get your keywords to match against "related" searches.

In this article, I'll explain how the different matching options work at all of the major search engines, then give Adwords advertisers some concrete steps you can take to get control of the extreme situation at Google.

Matching Options: Who Does What

To help clarify the situation, I've compiled a table of the different matching options available at Google, MSN, and Yahoo.

Search Engine
Match Type
Description

google

Exact Match
Will only match if the exact text is entered. A bid on [dog toys] would not be matched if the searcher types dog toy "“ singular and plural are not considered identical.

MSN

Exact Match
99% equivalent to Google's exact match, with exceptions. Words with apostrophes are combined into 1 variation at Google. MSN ignores "extraneous" words like a, an, the, etc.

yahoo

Standard Match
Similar to exact match, but Yahoo's Match Driver technology also includes singular, plural, common misspellings, and alternative spellings. Match Driver is used with all matching options, and you can't opt out.

google

Phrase Match
Will match any query that includes the exact phrase. A phrase match for "dog toys" would match big dog toys, but not toys for
big dog.

MSN

Phrase Match
Equivalent to Google's phrase match.

yahoo

Yahoo has no phrase match option. Seriously.

MSN

Broad Match
Will match any search query that includes all of the words. MSN does not combine singular/plural consistently, but they do some light synonym matching.

yahoo

Advanced   Match
Will match any search query that includes all of the words, plus singular, plural, spelling variations, and "synonyms." Dog may be considered a synonym for puppy, for example.

google

Broad Match
Like Yahoo Advanced Match, but Google's "expanded broad match" system also matches "related" queries. Dog toy could be matched up with pet toys, pet gifts"¦ or anything Google thinks is related.

googleMSN

Negative Match
Negative matches are keywords that you don't want to appear in the query. This allows you to avoid advertising on free television set when you do phrase or broad matches for "television set," by setting a negative match for "“ free.

yahoo

Excluded   Words
Similar to Google & MSN, but toy and toys are considered equivalent.

google

Embedded   Match
Most advertisers have never even heard of this one, but it's extremely powerful. It's a special type of negative match, where you can exclude exact or phrase matches.

google

Automatic Match
Not an actual match type, but a feature Google rolled out this year, that extends their already aggressive expanded broad matching even further. Your ad for adidas tennis shoes could be triggered when someone searches for running shoes.

So, What's Wrong With Broad Matching?

If you've asked that question, you're ready to learn"¦

The key to getting the best results out of your search advertising is how effectively your ad text, landing pages, and offer match a searcher's query. The less you know about what the searcher typed, the harder it is to deliver the right message and offer.

Advertising on queries where your ad doesn't make sense, or where your landing page and offer don't promise the searcher what they were looking for, is a waste of money.

Let's say you're selling dog toys. When someone searches for that exactly, you can show them an ad that's tested and tuned to get the best response, take them to a landing page that's tested and tuned to get the best response, and offer them your best (tested and tuned) selection of dog toys, to maximize your profitability.

If you aren't testing and tuning all of these things, that's a problem we'll tackle another day.

For now, let's assume that your dog toys ad, landing page, and offer are tested and tuned to get the maximum response from people who search for dog toys. Or if you aren't testing and tuning, at least designed to get the best response from that query.

Now, let's pretend that your dog toys ads are running on a broad match.

With MSN and Yahoo, you'll get a little bit of irrelevant traffic, at your expense of course. Searches for dog toy safety or how to get a dog to like new toy will trigger your ad. All those extra visitors are unlikely to convert into customers.

With Google, it gets even crazier. Your ad might trigger when someone searches for pet toy recall or other "related" searches.

If you're running 100% broad match, chances are good that at least half of your traffic is irrelevant, useless, and unlikely to convert.

Even if you're not doing quite that badly, your click through rate (CTR) at Google will suffer, and you're paying more per click than you should, for worse ad positions.

In short, if you're using 100% broad match at Google, you're in Broad Match Hell"¦ whether you know it or not.

How To Escape From This Hell

There are a few simple steps you can take to improve the situation.

One option is kill broad matching entirely, at least in the short term. This is up to you, but if your campaigns aren't delivering good ROI, it's not a bad idea as a first step, while you're implementing my other recommendations.

Mona Elesseily of Page Zero Media reported last year that simply converting all broad matches in an Adwords campaign to exact matches delivered big improvements in click through rate, cost per click, cost per conversion, and an overall increase in profitability.

Your mileage may vary, but you'd be amazed at how often this simple action improves things. Fortunately, you can take a less radical step at first, to find out what's going on.

My recommendations:

1. Organize your campaigns into tightly focused ad groups.

Many advertisers combine a lot of loosely related keywords into one big ad group, and this is a terrible idea.

The more closely the text of your ad and landing page match the keyword you bid on, and the actual search queries, the better you will do. Keep your dog toys ads and keywords in one ad group, put the dog leash ads in another.

Many advertisers go so far as to have a "one keyword per ad group" rule. To me, this is a little extreme, and difficult to manage, but it's better than dumping all of your keywords into one ad group.

2. Separate your ad groups into broad, phrase, and exact matches.

Like focusing your ad groups, this is definitely a best practice.

By separating your different match types into their own ad groups, you can start to see which match types are actually driving the most traffic, and which are actually driving the best ROI and conversion performance.

3. Find out exactly what people are searching for before they click.

Adwords provides a "Search Query Performance" report. If you do nothing else, you should be looking at this report, to find out what negative matches you need to add to your broad & phrase ad groups.

If you're using Google Analytics, there are a few different solutions you can try, to collect exact keyword data. I've been using a solution developed by "GA Experts" (http://tinyurl.com/5yrdgj) with several sites, but many folks are also using a script from ROI Revolution (http://tinyurl.com/36gzln).

Due to the wide variety of implementations, we can't provide technical assistance for everyone. The comments on both sites offer some useful tips on overcoming known problems.

4. Use negative matches with your phrase match and broad match ads.

If you're going to run anything other than exact matching, you need to use negative matches effectively. Assuming you've done step #3 above, you have a pretty good system for collecting new negative matches as your campaigns run.

Google also offers a pretty good research tool, within their Adwords Keyword Tool (http://tinyurl.com/qkfuh) to suggest possible negative matches "“ just select Negative from the match type menu as shown:

image

 

While you're waiting for data to collect in Google Analytics, you can use Google's tool to find the most obvious negative matches.

Heaven Can Wait?

Some day, maybe the major PPC search engines will provide a more complete set of matching options. For now, use these suggestions to cut the fat out of your Adwords campaigns, and enjoy your newfound profits.

Enjoy this Article? Get an entire Trial Issue of "The Net Effect" for only $1 (plus a special free bonus!)

Copyright © 2006-2009 StomperNet, LLC. All rights reserved.

logo_footer


Facebook Comments:

Comments

27 Responses to “Escape from Broad Match Hell!”
  1. When advertising, it is also important to double check the spelling of your keywords, sentence structure and grammar of the ad phrase, and of course, the number of traffic searching for your keyword.

  2. Rich says:

    Great recommendations. I heard about this few months ago from an online business magazine and now I could say it could be true. Your facts were concrete and you had a great explanations about it. Thanks a lot. ;-)

  3. Nice article, thanks for posting that !

  4. Vins says:

    this site was really awesome thanks for the share.

  5. hi thanks for sharing this useful information I've learned a lot from this article.Cheers!

  6. I definitely agree with your instructions for making very focused ad groups. That alone could make the difference between gaining good feedback from your campaigns and not.

  7. Essay says:

    Thanks a lot for the great research.
    It was realy usefull for my term paper.

  8. recomended says:

    Great information. There is nothing worse than getting an unexpected surprise.

  9. Everything is very open and very clear explanation of issues. It contains truly information. Your website is very useful. Thanks for sharing. Looking forward to more!

  10. sikiş says:

    thanks for this post.it's very helpfull have a nice day admin.

  11. Seriously,I dare say that all that theoretical "matches" don't really work in practice – I mean that I can't predict the tag that the standard human will use to find my unique page.Unfortunately the practice is so unfair,in my case at least!

  12. Jonny says:

    Very interesting and entertaining. I especially like the slide that had similar meaning words .

  13. Yea google is always changing its algorithm. Here soon we're going to see an update called caffeine I believe. I'm still not very sure what they're going to do personally, but it's going to have a big impact on all sorts of webtrends you see on the internet.

  14. Steve Lloyd says:

    Ha, this is something Google is getting better at by the day vs. yahoo. great post and awesome research!

  15. Malik says:

    a nice and pretty ordinary work done….

    BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRILLIANT

  16. I usually use Google Adwords in order to choose the best selection of keyword for my website. The most interesting thing is that the way I suppose doesn't really matches with the way people actually searching for the services we offer.

  17. sohbet says:

    thanks for this post.it's very helpfull have a nice day admin.

  18. Jim Huinink says:

    Wow! Go into much detail? I hope to be setting up some new campaigns soon and I will revisit this post before I do so. Thanks Lyndon. I just RT'ed this, too.

  19. Great stuff guys, you always deliver great quality at Stompernet, for me I only ever use exact match, but this is seeing it from an seo, organic traffic, not an adwords advertiser.

  20. onagra says:

    thank you for this interesting info. i was looking for something like this.
    i enjoy reading your blog

  21. Interesting article.I have read your article and found interesting and helpful.I wish to see more from you in future.Thanks for sharing.

  22. Loris says:

    Thank you Tom, this is a good wake-up call for me to use negative keywords in my campaign! Keep the good content coming.

  23. furacoua says:

    I like the way you explain it, maybe even I can understand it now. Thanks!

  24. Excellent comparison of the different ways each of the Big 3 treats different match types. I haven't dealt with MSN & Yahoo too much as far as paid search, but I have some basic experience with each so it was nice to get a refresher on the match types. I definitely agree with your instructions for making very focused ad groups. That alone could make the difference between gaining good feedback from your campaigns and not. -Mike

  25. Film Izle says:

    I've read a few of your blogs and i think this is the best I've seen. Its an organized, easy to read blog. Thank you for sharing this with us.

  26. diseño web says:

    Hi, it's a interesting article, but in others StomperNets articles your recomends don't use broad match. That's was change?

    Regards

  27. of course, Keywords are essential in PPC or pay-per-click. but i don't recommend ppc.. i guess it is just a waste of time and money.

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree